Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Concert Review Part 1: July 29, 2010 at Essex Junction: Heloise and the Savoir Faire

Hola Companjeras, and welcome back to the A.Q. After a brief hiatus, MattintheBelfry is back with the A.Q.'s first ever concert review!  The rewview will be split into a new posting for each band. So let's start at the beginning shall we?

When my friends called me up and we started planning a mini road trip for this summer, we knew a show would need to be the axis of our journey. Besides my obvious connections with music, one of my friends is a DJ, the other is the only non-musical person I know with a more extensive music collection than me, and the third had (gasp!) never been to a live show before. Always on point, Greg suggested the upcoming Gogol Bordello / Primus double bill in Essex Junction. An outdoor general admission concert? Count us in.

The Champlain Valley Fairgrounds of Essex Junction, VT plays host to a plethora of shows each year, with an emphasis on alternative rock and local bands. The venue was expansive and offered concessions (which Les Claypool of Primus would later comment on), above average facilities, free parking, and, perhaps its best feature; the ability to stay in the pit or close to the stage for one song, and then walk around without a crowd for another.

Scanning the crowd, it was odd and reassuring seeing the percentage of fans in the audience. Typically in double billed shows one band still prevails over the other in support. However, this night there was a notable 50% split between the Gogol Bordello and Primus fans, and they both seemed to respect and enjoy each others taste. Kumbiyah.

Without further adu - the opening band!

Heloise and the Savoir Faire
Vermont natives Heloise and the Savoir Faire (that's a French idiom for "the ability to do the right thing") kicked off the show in full regalia and synth-pop fashion. Lead vocalist Heloise and her two dancing friends, Joe Shephard and Sara Sweet Rabidoux, looked like Ocean State Job Lot versions of Lady Gaga creations. The group's make-up and costumes, not to mentioned Shephard and Rabidoux's interpretive dancing, caused me to fear for the worse - that like other bejeweled groups (I'm looking at you KISS, Korn, and Cher), the Savoir Faire were about to hide so-so music with enough weird "fierce" pageantry in order to "razzle dazzle" the audience. With a sigh of relief from my friends and I, Heloise and her band mates began pumping up the fairgrounds with an infectious mix of synth-pop, punk, and a surprisingly refreshing dose of disco that did not use the group's visual gags as an excuse but melding perfectly with it.

After the initial two songs, I realized the ingenuity of the group's performance -  their get-up was a mockery which was both note-worthy and delightfully unnoticeable. It wouldn't take a MENSA member to realize how the group was poking fun at everyone in the music business, from record companies to virgin artists, pop stars, and even the audience. However, the theatrics were performed in a way that implied a self-conscious honesty on the part of the group - they were poking fun at themselves too, and everyone was free to laugh with and at them. It was clear what the group's mission was; The Savoir Faire were here to have fun and maybe gain some fans along the way.


As far as the music goes, I actually enjoyed the group's art, despite my typical aversion to anything dance-pop. Heloise's voice is quite wonderful and healthy, and her dynamic range is expansive and effortless (which made for some really big "kick-ass" moments, even for an audience that seemed completely alien to the group's work). Heloise's decision some years ago to experiment with a live band playing along with the pre-recorded loops and effects was greatly appreciated as well, and made for a much more organic and authentic performance. Thankfully, the charmingly off-beat and sometimes spastic dancing of Shephard and Robidoux succeeded in its attempt of manifesting the music and performance theme, inviting the crowd to participate in the joke of life they portrayed.

Hopefully, Heloise will continue to add effective methods from her own experiences in the music world (i.e. bus driving for Peaches, working with Phish, Deborah Harry, and paying rent to Danny Moynihan) to her repertoire. The Savoir Faire, without a doubt, have a good product, and with the recent success of groups like the Ting-Tings and Lady Gaga, may have a market for it. Add in the freedom of working for music lover Elijah Wood of LOTR fame, and don't be surprised if you hear from the Vermont locals soon.

P.S. - I was not allowed to bring in my Flip video, so I apologize profusely for the sound quality on the videos. For a much better listen to the bands, PLEASE youtube their music videos or check out the Amazon media sampler on the right-hand tool bar of the blog.




Next Up - Gogol Bordello!!!


        

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Album Review 2: Learning to Bend

The Album: Learning to Bend
The Artist: Ben Sollee
The A.Q. Rating: 7 out of 10


"An oak and a reed were arguing about their strength. When a strong wind came up, the reed avoided being uprooted by bending and leaning with the gusts of wind. But the oak stood firm and was torn up by the roots."  
- from Aesop's Fables


It would be pretty hard for the listener to miss the thematic elements of Ben Sollee's first solo record, 2008's Learning to Bend

From the title of the album and the title track's blatant chorus ("Are you strong enough to bend?") to the prominent genre-spanning instrument (Sollee's cello), Learning to Bend is all about the perseverance of the human spirit, the strength of flexibility, and the hope for a better tomorrow. 

It is the method of embodiment of this human spirit that separates Sollee's efforts from the mass of folk singer-songwriters out there. Sollee's sparse yet beautifully resonant arrangements blur and "bend" the lines between the bluegrass, jazz, and rock genres without leaving a distinct aftertaste. His cello (an instrument that in and of itself is comfortable in jazz, classical, or bluegrass settings) is the common factor throughout the album, although there are a few tracks where he puts down his bow in favor of some old fashioned acoustic guitar. The cello plays an integral role in the masterful instrumentation Sollee demonstrates throughout the album, stringing together lovely harmony lines or acting as a rhythmic catalyst in Sollee's upbeat cover of Sam Cooke's "A Change is Gunna Come". The well discerned use of the cello lines are so powerful that their few absences are even more breath taking, specifically when they are replaced by a harp on the title track, "Bend", before returning in an organic swell to the chorus.

It is not only the cello lines that demonstrate Sollee's wonderful gift for instrumentation. The quirky "Bury Me in My Car" features fiddle and the use of jaw harps, and Sollee is accompanied by the virtuosic banjo picking of former Sparrow Quartet band mate Bela Fleck on "It's Not Impossible". The back up vocals of "Bend", supplied by another former band mate, Abigail Washburn, compliment the subject of the song, the harp, and Sollee's own voice strikingly. The use of vibraphones, saxophone, set, and various hand drums add an irresistible spice of jazz and pop into various tracks on the album, especially the soul-infused porch-rocker "How to See the Sun Rise".

A quick note on Sollee's voice; simply put, it's a solid and honest folk voice. Soulful and endearing, Sollee's vocals freshen up the tired image of the road-weary folk singer. His voice isn't as rough and "of the people" as Bob Dylan or Springsteen, but is still a relatable voice from the crowd, if not a more polished one.


Unfortunately, as expertly as Sollee's crafting of the actual music of this album, his lyrical discretion is nowhere near as well versed. For every elegant line, such as the opening verse of the entire album, "When the storm comes / will you reject the rain? / If it falls not soft / if it falls not tame?", there are three or four clumsy clunkers. For instance, in that exact same track, "A Few Honest Words", Sollee sings the over-explained cliche "Our love of freedom / puts a veil over our eyes / and rights that are given / can be taken away". Occasionally, Sollee's lyrics can hide behind the guise of  quirkiness, like in "Bury Me in My Car" and "Prettiest Tree on the Mountain", however, the awkwardness of some lines simple cannot be ignored. Ironically, the majority of the lyrical issues on the album seem to stem from Sollee's inability to bend his political and personal agenda to meet his own music. This symptom is most noticeable on the cover of "A Change is Gunna Come", where Sollee regrettably adds the rather direct and prose-free verse to Sam Cooke's more universal words, "I tried to find it / some better place / where having the biggest gun / ain't some kind of race".

It is not to say that Sollee's lyrical mishaps overpower the album though. In fact, there are several moments where the lyrics actually relate to the music seamlessly, rather than being rescued by the music. This is especially true on the more subtle and soft tracks on the album, specifically the tender and doubtful "I Can't", in which Sollee's allusions and metaphors are refreshing and charmingly sad. "This ain't the sword pulled from the lake / Yours ain't the heart I want to break" whispers Sollee against the descending nostalgia of an electric guitar. The same holds true for the other ballads on the album ("Panning for Gold" and "Bend"), although the sheer length of the album ending lullaby "Copper and Malachite" leaves them once more vulnerable to criticism.

Overall, Learning to Bend should excite listener's to a growing talent in Sollee, and offers a beautifully orchestrated cross-pollination of genres that truly is strong enough to bend.



Strengths:
- Superb orchestration
- Creative and innovative use of cello to cross genres
- Vocals are stylistically appropriate and technically sound
- Wonderful use of harmony and back up vocals
- Sparse arrangements are extremely well managed and not anemic
- Very few noticeable examples of production interferences
- Thematic elements are relatable to modern culture and easily recognized


Weaknesses:
- Prose can become clumsy and awkward
- Lyrics can at times become too direct and over simplified
- Concluding track is slightly too long
- Track sequencing towards the front of the album could be re-thought
- Additional verse in "A Change is Gunna Come"


Recommended Tracks:
Track 2, "How to See the Sun Rise"
Track 4, "Bend"
Track 5, "It's Not Impossible"
Track 6, "I Can't"
Track 9, "A Change is Gunna Come"
Track 11, "Copper and Malachite"


For Fans of: Abigail Washburn and the Sparrow Quartet, Amos Lee, Crooked Still, Ben Harper, Damien Rice, "Dear Companion", Bela Fleck, Sufjan Stevens

 














Friday, July 9, 2010

Concert Reminder/Update

Hi all, don't forget to check out the FREE local show tonight at the Franco-American Club in Waterbury, CT.  Doors open at 5:30, and once the building is at capacity, the doors will close. This is an awesome chance to see some of the state's top local bands, including friends of the A.Q. To Write a Riot, for no cost!



Also, the A.Q. is ecstatic to announce that in two weeks, we will be posting our first concert review. The A.Q. will be attending the Primus / Gogol Bordello show in VT on July 29. The review, hopefully complete with some video footage of the show, will be posted shortly after.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Unplugged 2 - Faking It for Making It - Authenticity in Today's Pop and Rock

About 6 months ago I happened on this article from The Faster Times while doing research and exploring for an 8th grade general music unit plan I was constructing based on composing with music software as a means of learning. The lesson I was constructing within the unit plan dealt with the blues genre - defining it, being able to identify and differentiate it from other genres, using its defining characteristics to create new, stylistically correct compositions, and noting its impact on western music and today's music.

As one of the homework assignments, the students used music-map , a free online program that organizes various artists in an organizer based on their similarity to a set "hub" artist, to find if artist they recognized were related to a set list of blues artist. The next day, one of my more passionate students, Bobby, came into class and said "We need to talk about this assignment thing." Bobby was absolutely appalled at his findinngs from his homework - or as he said, "How the hell can you even compare Ray Charles to Amy Winehouse??"





Luckily, I was hoping one of the kids would find this, and I had the music video for "Rehab" playing on the wall of the music lab in a matter of seconds. We went through the motions of our daily game, "What makes me blue?", for the song. The class begrudgingly agreed that there were blues aspects in the song - the backing brass band, some blue notes, etc. We listened again to the chorus of "Rehab" a couple more times, and then finally one of them got it -

"Wait..... is that a 12 bar blues progression? Dude."

Throughout the lesson was had listened to songs and debated their "bluesiness" with each other - starting off easier with some Big Maceo Merriweather and eventually going through The Beatles' "Can't Buy Me Love", and Zeppelin's "Rock and Roll".  But it was Winehouse who opened up the wormhole of the socio-political impacts on and of music.

We used the controversy over Winehouse's supposed merit as a blues artist to question not only the artist they listen to daily, but also how we interpreted said music. We discussed the aforementioned article - why do artists and listeners need music to be disguised as something else, like feeding medicine to a dog?  Is this morally right?

The discussion eventually turned to race, based off of Jack White's quote, "[music videos, quirky back story, etc] is just there to distract people from that fact that we were playing the blues. That a white boy was playing this."). We talked about the fact that blues is characterized as "black" music. If there is black music, what are its characteristics? Are they based off of cultural reflection and experiences or stereotypes, or both? If there is black music, and its played by a white musician, does that make it no longer black? Or does it make the white musician a black musician? And if there's black music, isn't there also white, yellow, brown, dyslexic, A.D.D. and dwarfism music? What are the impacts on the view of the alleged power of music and universality of music if that is true? To what extent is music "powerful" and in what ways is our categorization of it impact this?

The lesson went extremely well, as it not only served up the content, but led to a critical change in how the kids listen to their own music, and about how music actually affects them outside of the emotional realm.

I posted the article because, especially in the current climate we are in, it's a good idea to question ourselves as a society through our art in the same way my students are now questioning theirs.

Name. Reflect. Act.

MattintheBelfry

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Album Review 1: Broken Bells

 The Album: Broken Bells
The Artist: Broken Bells
The A.Q. Rating: 8 out of 10



When I first caught wind that former Shins frontman James Mercer was in the studio working on a collaboration project, I admit I was more then a little worried.

In today's pop music world, collaborations typically bring to mind the countless hip hop and r&b tracks that have enough "feat. artist y, feat. artist x, feat artist z and the artist c band" to force my Ipod screen to scroll through artist information longer than the actual song takes to play. These guest artists typically do very little to constitute a collaboration - perhaps a vocalize here, an exclamation there, or maybe even taking two solo verses - but nothing that shows a collaborative effort to make something new out of two aspects.

Even alleged collaborations in other genres are guilty of this - take perhaps one of them most infamous cross-genre collaborations of all time, Run-DMC and Aerosmith's "Walk This Way". Granted, the song cross-pollinated audiences that wanted nothing to do with each other, and provided not only a great tune but also some needed critical change, but was it really that groundbreaking for the artists involved? No offence to Run-DMC, but rapping the lyrics to an already known rock hit with the addition of some scratching doesn't exactly constitute their best work. Nor does having a black hip hop group rap your lyrics to your own accompaniment speak well for the strengths or understanding of the collaborative genre on Aerosmith's part.

I feared that Mercer was simply selling himself short, dooming to become a "featured" artist.

Then I heard about the collaborating artist: Brian Burton. A.k.a., DJ Danger Mouse, of Grey Album fame.

I purchased a copy of Broken Bells the next morning.




On the surface, Broken Bells is much like watching World Cup football for the first time. Sure, you can see why people like it - and it's entertaining, but it isn't until you see the slow-mo replays of Ronaldo's quick, graceful, and purposeful foot changes and dribbling or the detailed physicality for possession that one can truly understand the fanaticism that surrounds the sport. At first listen, Broken Bells sounds wonderful - a short, 30 minute album of groovable pop with some cool effects. Good enough to play once in awhile, just as a break from the usual suspects on your playlists, but nothing groundbreaking.

But then you'll listen to it a second time. Then you'll realizing your grooving to a melancholy song about a stripper. Then you'll listen a little closer a third time. Perhaps a fourth. And then the identity of the album begins to leak out.

The biggest strength of the album is that it utilizes the strengths of both parties, Mercer and Burton, to an extent that not only highlights their strengths but combines them in a way that covers their defects. There are no superfluous effects used by Burton, with every added harmony, beat, and synth executing a specific purpose. The lyrics, although introspective (and certainly with a touch of advice to Mercer's former band mates), play upon enough universal themes (life choices, postmodern guilt, letting go, etc.) to empower the empathy of the listener.

Obviously, the album has some experimental qualities to it; do not expect to hear The Shins, nor expect to hear the Gorillaz. Burton and Mercer's experimentation with Broken Bells is out-of-box, but not out-of -mind. Perhaps the most blatant and radical experiment is the sudden discovery of Mercer's quite wonderful falsetto (think Jamiroquai, or more fittingly, Damon Albarn of the Gorillaz) in the fourth track of the album, "The Ghost Inside", and the hellish composition of the waltz in the album's fifth and weaker track, "Sailing to Nowhere".

Besides the positive consequences of the successful collaboration between the two indie stars, the album has a few glaring strengths from Burton's production. The album uses no samples, and combined with the lyrical themes presented as well as the unfortunate fact that there are several times when the lyrics are unintelligable, implies the old romantic ideal of "music for music's sake", or music itself over the ideals it can represent. Even upon the intial listening, Burton's sequencing of the tracks is also perfect, and truly cements the confidence of the album.

As far as familiarity, there are elements, but only elements, of both artist's former projects, most notably that of Burton's work with Gnarls Barkley on the grammy winning St. Elsewhere, and Mercer's work with the Shins on tracks like "Vaporize". There are hints to other artists, but nothing that would rationalize a specific allusion. Some of these elements include the Beach Boy's Pet Sounds can clearly be heard (especially with the opening track and single, "The High Road"), and there are elements of everything from Prince ("The Ghost Inside"), Beatles ("Vaporize"), and B-52s ("Mongrel's Heart").

Suffice it to say, the album shows what a true collaboration is, and characterizes both artists in a fashion that is both just and productive, while providing a new element for the listener. While I do not think this album is the best effort to define each artist, it certaintly was a daring, fun, and successful side project. So give it more than a listen, and in the words of Broken Bells themselves, "Don't run, don't rush/ just float" ("October").


Strengths:
- Great sequencing
- Nearly all tracks are independently strong
- Lyrics are well written and balanced
- No superfluous production
-Production is purposeful and impactful
- Experimentation is daring without becoming insulting or evasive
-Shows a true balance of the artists' strengths to produce something unique

Weaknesses:
- Replacement of original pre-release track with ballad "Citizen" questionable
- Album is short - roughly 30 minutes
- Lyrics are sometimes too difficult to hear in a way that interrupts the affect of the song

Recommended Tracks:
Track 1, "The High Road"
Track 3, "The Ghost Inside"
Track 6, "Trap Doors"
Track 9, "October"


For Fans of: The Gorillaz, Gnarls Barkley, Beck, The Shins, Danger Mouse, Jamiroquai, The Beach Boys' Pet Sounds 


    

UPCOMING FREE SHOW!

A week from tonight, July 8, 2010, the Franco-American Club of Waterbury, CT, will play host to an unprecedented FREE show with a huge bill of local bands.



The "Save the Scene Show", presented by Adam Lopez, will feature 10 of CT's local bests, including friends of the A.Q. To Write a Riot!

Also billed to perform on the main stage are Jacobi Wichita, Surrender the Dancefloor, Wess Meets West, Forget Tomorrow, We Attack at Dawn, and Forget Paris.

The show is also planning an acoustic stage for 3 of the 10 acts, Consonance, The Premiere, and former Shut Up and Deal members Pat & Tom.

Doors open at 5:30 and the show starts at 6, hope to see you there!

MattintheBelfry

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Unplugged 1: LOST and Chopin

The following is an original essay I am currently editing and adding to for future publication. I began writing this piece as a research project for a composition class I was taking under Dr. Christian Carey at Westminster. 

WARNING: This article contains integral plot points, explanation, and spoilers for LOST seasons 1-6. Please do not read if you do not wish to be spoiled. 

“The Rest is Just Progress”:
An exploration into the thematic ideals of Lost through Chopin’s Fantasie Impromptu in c-sharp minor, Op. 66

            Originally a mini-series  under the working title of “The Circle”, ABC’s Lost has developed into one of the most complex and popular dramas in the past decade. The show is infamous for its innumerable plots and subplots, extensive cast of characters, mythological and scientific subtexts, relevant social themes, and innovative narrating devices.
            From the very first episode, viewers were introduced to the theme of antagonism through the recurring  symbol of black and white. As main character John Locke explains, “There are two players, two sides; one white, and one black” (Abrams). From the pieces of Locke’s backgammon games, to the black and white doomsday clock in the hatch and the stones balanced and passed between Lost mythological figures Jacob and his adversary, the unnamed “man in black”, white and black play a prominent role in reminding the viewers of both the show’s plot-driven antagonisms (Jacob vs. Man in Black, for example) and the thematic antagonism (including fate vs. free will and faith vs. science).
It is no surprise then, to see the piano, with its alternating black and white keys,  as a recurringsymbol. Throughout the six seasons of Lost, the viewer sees several characters play the piano during scenes of introspection. Before the thrilling season four finale, masterful manipulator Benjamin Linus is shown playing Rachmaninoff Prelude in C# minor. Hero Jack Shephard and musician Charlie Pace are seen playing the piano multiple times in all of the shows various timelines. However, out of the various piano pieces used throughout the show, there are none that are more appropriate nor used as often as Chopin’s Fantasie Impromptu in C-sharp Minor. Chopin’s piece goes beyond the simple metaphor of the black and white keys of the piano. Throughout the first and last sections of the piece, Chopin juxtaposes the rhythmic contrast of triplets and sixteenth notes in each hand. This rhythmic antagonism is a direct reflection of the previously mentioned antagonisms in the show.
The piece made its first appearance in season five’s “The Variable”, as the young Daniel Faraday is seen practicing it in a flashback.  In this scene, the young Faraday cannot play the piece well at all, as he can not master the antagonistic rhythms or keep consistent with the metronome, which he attempts to follow despite the improvisational flexibility the piece implies. As we see throughout this season, Faraday has the same technical issues with the island.  Faraday acts as the source of scientific explanation on Lost, including the explanations of the shows notorious narrative techniques, which include sudden shifts in time and even continuous narration of simultaneous alternate timelines. In the fifth season, Faraday, who to this point has had indirect experience with time travel on the island, only has a partial explanation for the issue of time travel, claiming that, “Time--it's like a street, all right? We can move forward on that street, we can move in reverse, but we cannot ever create a new street. If we try to do anything different, we will fail every time. Whatever happened, happened” (Cuse). Faraday uses this theory to hypothesize that if the characters unleash the electromagnetic properties of the island, the entire timeline of the show will cease to exist in space-time, and therefore be reset to the beginning. However, much like his initial interpretation of the Chopin, Faraday has the right themes and notes, but the wrong technical application, and when the characters do attempt to blow up the island, they actual create two parallel timelines.
The parallel “alternate” timeline is once again introduced to us with the Fantasie Impromptu Op. 66, as we see Jack Shephard’s son David (who only exists in this reality) perform the piece. It is essential to note that in this episode, the directors ensure to have the audience listen and watch as David plays the middle section of the piece. The Chopin is divided into three main ideas. The first section is in c-sharp minor, while the second section, is in the enharmonic parallel major key, D-flat major. The sudden shift in tonality through parallel keys correlates with the sudden shift of narrative and reality in the sixth and final season of Lost.  The tonal organization of the Chopin also has other similarities with the qualities of the alternate timeline.
The D-flat major section, besides its more optimistic sounding key, also has a much more easily recognized melody line from the previous c-sharp minor section. Although there is still the presence of the rhythmic antagonism from the previous section, it is much more subtle than before and is completely overruled by the melody. In the alternate reality of the show, all of our characters have everything they seemed to strive for in their flashbacks presented to the viewer throughout the previous seasons. Jack is still a skilled surgeon and caring father, John Locke comes to grips with his wheelchair-bound state and is ready to be happily married, and Hurley is a successful and influential owner of a fast food restaurant chain. However, when the characters begin to have flashes of their memory from the events of the other timeline, their seemingly perfect existence in this reality is questioned and begins to grow trite. The melody in the Chopin exemplifies this decomposition, as the melody is gradually overtaken by the rhythmic  antagonism of the initial section (and in some edited scores returns to the initial c-sharp minor section). The melody has also, fittingly enough, been adapted by Henry Carroll in his pop song “I’m Always Chasing Rainbows”. The lyrics, written by Joseph McCarthy, read, “I'm always chasing rainbows / Watching clouds drifting by / My dreams are just like all my schemes / Ending in the sky” (McCarthy).  Even through the indirect means of Carroll’s adaptation of Chopin’s melody, we can see the common notion of the superficial existence that appears in the parallel timeline in Lost.
It is once again, Daniel Faraday who awakens the characters to the existence of the original timeline. Like several of the other characters at this point in the show’s history, Faraday is dead in the original timeline, but alive in this alternate reality. In this reality, Faraday is fulfilled – his mother does not force him to become a physicist, and he is instead, a musician. We watch as Faraday plays a flawless performance of the Fantasie Impromptu Op. 66, much improved from the original event. Faraday is one of the first characters to remember events from the original timeline, and his knowledge is represented in his performance. Now, Faraday understands the parallels and structure of the two timelines as well as the good vs. evil antagonism within himself, and therefore, is able to perform the corresponding sections of the Chopin without the technical problems exhibited before. This mastery allows Faraday to truly play the piece as an impromptu, as he flexes the tempo (or bends time, to fit more within the Lost context) within the contextual guidelines. To play along with one of the major antagonistic themes of Lost, Faraday exhibits the ability to use free will within a destined context.
The Chopin concludes with the return of the antagonistic rhythms. However, the rhythms gradually dissipate until the last chord of the piece, a C-sharp major chord. This concluding gesture to the tonic chord of the D-flat major section in the surrounding context of “A” section material may suggest the creation and execution of a distinct ending which is culminated from both sections. In relation to Lost, this foreshadows the end of the series, the end to which Lost mythological figure Jacob will happen when he stated simply, “It only ends once – the rest is just progress” (Cuse).
In the series finale, we once again see Faraday perform in the alternate reality. However, Faraday has now ditched the Chopin for his newfound experiment, a “classical-rock fusion” with fellow deceased character Charlie Pace’s band, Driveshaft. The sudden alteration in the only piece we have ever witnessed Faraday play, from his youth in the original timeline to his virtuosic rendition in the initial unveiling of the alternate reality, and even indirectly through the scribbled instructions in Faraday’s handwriting on David Shephard’s sheet music, is striking and purposeful. It is only in the last scenes of the series finale when the audience is finally told the nature of the alternate reality; that this reality is one fashioned by the characters themselves after each of them have died, until each of them has remembered their previous lives and deaths and can move on together. This fabricated reality not only explains the characters mirrored fortunes form their previous lives (including Faraday’s musicianship), but also connects back to the middle section of the Chopin and the implied levels of understanding, conscientization, and fabricated idealism presented in the narration of this alternate timeline.  The series concludes in a similar fashion to the Chopin, on its own C-sharp major chord, the creation of something new (whatever the characters may “move on to) through the culmination of its two parts.

Works Cited
Abrams, J.J. (Writer/Director), & Lindelof, D. (2004). Pilot: Part 2 [Television series episode]. In J.J. Abrams (Executive Producer), Lost.  ABC Broadcasting.
Cuse, C. (Writer), Lindelof, D. (Writer) & Bender, J. (Director). (2009). The Incident [Television series episode]. In J.J. Abrams (Executive Producer), Lost.  ABC Broadcasting.
Cuse, C. (Writer), Lindelof, D. (Writer) & Bender, J. (Director). (2010). Lighthouse. [Television series episode]. In J.J. Abrams (Executive Producer), Lost.  ABC Broadcasting.
Cuse, C. (Writer), Lindelof, D. (Writer) & Bender, J. (Director). (2010). Happily Ever After [Television series episode]. In J.J. Abrams (Executive Producer), Lost.  ABC Broadcasting.
Horowitz, A. (Writer), Kitsis, E. (Writer) & Lieber, J. (Director). (2004). The Variable [Television series episode]. In J.J. Abrams (Executive Producer), Lost.  ABC Broadcasting.
Jonson, G.C.A. (1905). A handbook of Chopin’s work. New York, New York: Doubleday, Page & Co.
McCarthy, J. I’m Always Chasing Rainbows.
thepolonaise (user name). Yundi Li – Chopin “Fantasie” Impromptu, Op. 66. Available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvm2ZsRv3C8